My Final Paper
Well, here's what I have. I would strongly suggest not reading this paper if you havent seen the movie and plan to. Spoilers are abound.
Jay Morse
Prof. Sexson
Engl 210D-01
14 June 2005
Mythic Context of the Film “Hero”
In the opening scene of the film we see a man in a carriage being escorted by a procession of horses. The first words spoken are an inward monologue that immediately sets the hero up; “I was orphaned at a young age and was never given a name” (Hero). It is here that we see the most abundant archetype of the mythic figure, the orphaned child. While his birth and childhood is a mystery it is a tie-in with the other characters in the story as well (but more on that later).
As Nameless is brought to the temple of the King of Qin we see him progress up the exceedingly long staircase as if in ascension. This is odd in that this is something that would be seen near the end of a story, but as we soon find out this is a story that is told in true story form. It is told as events that have already happened. When Nameless finally is given audience with the king we discover another archetype of the heroic figure, he holds a lowly position in the societal caste being a mere prefect.
As Nameless tells the story of how he came to defeat the first assassin, Sky, we are immediately set upon with mythic images. The falling water of the chess house, signifying Nameless’ “birth” into his mission, his first appearance in the scene is where he is standing in the threshold of a door, waiting to cross over to duel Sky, and the blind musician who eventually breaks the strings of his instrument to signify destruction. It is also in this scene that we are first witness to our hero’s supernatural abilities, with his adeptness at swordplay and his incredible agility, another of the archetypical qualities of the hero.
The scene is next shifted to the first appearance of Snow and Broken Sword in the calligraphy school. All the participants in the scene and backdrops are in a red hue signifying blood, violence, or extreme emotion. This is our fist indicator that this story is the lie that the king discerns it to be, yet it still contains fragments of mythic overtones. We see in this scene the aged, wise teacher of the calligraphy school who shares his knowledge of the pen being not mightier, but as mighty as the sword. He can be seen as the father figure imparting knowledge. We also see that Snow and Broken Sword have taken up residence in a dry, barren area, signifying that they may be emotionally stunted by past events. We also see in this scene more of the supernatural ability that the characters possess in the defense of the school.
When we go back to the king and Nameless in the temple we see the first sign of a heroic act in the king himself as he professes his desire to unite the land under one language to ease communication. This is where we see Nameless begin to realize the necessity for a ruler. The king also displays heroic qualities in deciphering the lie that Nameless has told to him. We then see the scene that the king believes to be true told in a backdrop of blue signifying a cleansing, or understanding, like water of sorts. At the end of the fights the servant of Broken Sword bestows upon Nameless the weapons of the assassins, the talismans of his quest. More symbolic mysticism is approached when the king states that he was warned of Nameless’ treachery “By the flickering of 100 candles” (Hero). This is telling of the king’s own supernatural abilities.
When the final true story is revealed to us, we begin to see all of the true mythic correlations. We see the supernatural abilities of Nameless are in this last section of the movie revealed to the fullest extent. Nameless has a move that cannot be parried inside of ten paces, and his sword is so swift and precise that it can enter a body without hitting any vital organs. We see the battle that takes place between Nameless and Moon (the minion of broken sword). We also see the hero asking for assistance in his quest when he approaches the assassins with his plan.
While all of these are archetypes of the heroic figure, the most interesting part of the story is the face that the three main male characters are portrayed as the heroic figure through the build of the hero archetype. Nameless is the man with the quest, the supernatural ability, and the clouded past who had an attempt on his life at an early age. The king of Qin is the character who reigns over the land, and lives in solitude. Finally there is Broken Sword who is driven from the city, lives in a barren area, and ultimately dies under mysterious circumstances at the top of a hill. It is through the act of unification of the land that these three main characters become the “hero” of our story, and make up the archetype that we have thus far learned about.
As we have learned however, all heroic figures have had women figures that interacted with them, yet in this movie we only see two females the entire time, and one is the minion of Broken Sword. The obvious question becomes, “What woman figure is Snow?” She is all four at one point or another in the story. She is an earth mother at the end of the movie when she comforts Broken Sword atop the hill overlooking the land and dies with him. She is the temptress in the scene that is first told by Nameless to the king, adorned in red and trying to seduce Broken Sword. She is the platonic ideal when she decides to help Nameless without the assistance of Broken Sword, and fighting him into submission. She is the unfaithful wife when Nameless reveals that Sky and Snow were lovers. While some of these female archetypes are seen in stories that are later revealed to be lies they still convey the message of the story within the story and how the role of the female character is muddled and confused over time with re-telling.
While the mythic images in the film are more than prevalent, I would like to, in closing, approach the subject that has been my obsession since the beginning of the term, originality. This story is a beautiful piece of work through the sights and sounds that we are subject to. It is told in a format that we are familiar with, that being the story within the story. The heroes fall into the archetypes that we have learned about time and again in stories that we have read. So is this an original work? I have come to the conclusion that it is only original in the sense of its message. The actually telling of the story and the inclusion of the hero archetypes are refurbishments. The originality of the story is in the combination of the message the story conveys and the format in which it is told. This type of originality is what makes the great stories stick out in our minds and help us to remember the message. This is the reason that we remember the works of Shakespeare and movies like the Wizard of Oz. Yes, we know the princess will find her prince and live happily ever after, but how the story is told to us and the message that it brings to the fore-front are the important and original ideas. Aesop’s Fables are a wonderful example of stories that can easily been put into the archetype formula, yet we will still read them because the original idea that they convey to us is what entertains and delights us. Although art is oftentimes imitating life, life can be entertaining so art should be as well if it is to capture our curiosity.
Works Cited
Hero. Dir. Zhang Yimou. Perf. Jet Li, Tony Leung, Maggie Cheung, and Zhang
Ziyi. Miramax, 2002.